Audit engagement
Resubmission findings review
Targeted financial audit of applications after a funder or lender returns comments — we check whether corrections actually close the cited gaps.
Who this engagement serves
Teams preparing a second or third filing who need an independent read of whether reviewer comments were fully addressed.
What you receive
- Side-by-side reading of comments against your revised schedules
- Flag list for unfinished or cosmetic-only corrections
- Short memo for your internal filing decision
- Optional thirty-minute clarifying call
Outside this scope
- Negotiating with the funder on your behalf
- Rewriting the entire packet
- New full-packet audit unless separately commissioned
How the audit proceeds
-
1
Comment inventory
Each funder or lender remark is logged and mapped to a revised location.
-
2
Closure test
We test whether the revision substantively answers the remark, not merely restates it.
-
3
Decision memo
You receive a clear view of residual risk before the next portal upload.
Preparation on your side
Share the original decision letter or comment sheet, the revised packet, and a note on what you already changed.
Constraints we respect
Incomplete comment sheets or missing prior versions slow the review; we will pause the clock until both arrive.
Ready to put a financing or subsidy packet under review? Send the packet outline and we will confirm fit within two business days.